Skip to main content
Skip to explanation
A.R.S. § 14-2507

How to Revoke a Will

Verified April 4, 202657th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

Arizona law provides two ways to revoke a will. You can execute a new will that replaces the old one. Or you can physically destroy the old will with the intent to revoke it. The statute also addresses what happens when a new will only partially conflicts with an older one.

Title 14, INTESTATE SUCCESSION AND WILLS

azleg.gov

Two Ways to Revoke a Will

Revoking a will in Arizona is a deliberate act. You cannot accidentally revoke a will. Simply telling someone you want to change your planning document does not undo a signed will. The statute lays out two specific methods.

First, you can execute a new will that expressly revokes the previous one or that conflicts with it. Second, you can physically destroy the will through burning, tearing, canceling, or making it unreadable. If someone else performs the destruction, they must do so in your conscious presence and at your direction.

A testator may revoke a will in whole or in part: 1. By executing a subsequent will that revokes the previous will or part expressly or by inconsistency. 2. By performing a revocatory act on the will if the testator performs the act with this intent or if another person performs the act in the testator's conscious presence and by the testator's direction.

A.R.S. § 14-2507(A)

A physical act of destruction only works if the testator intended to revoke the will. If a document gets damaged in a fire or by accident, that does not revoke it without intent behind the act. Your power of attorney holder cannot revoke your will for you either. Only the testator can take this step.

When a New Will Replaces or Supplements the Old One

Creating a new will does not always wipe out the old one entirely. Arizona law draws a line between replacement and supplement. If the new will makes a complete disposition of your real estate, financial accounts, and other assets, the law presumes you intended it to replace the earlier will. If the new will only addresses specific items, the law presumes it was meant to supplement.

The testator is presumed to have intended a subsequent will to replace rather than supplement a previous will if the subsequent will makes a complete disposition of the testator's estate.

A.R.S. § 14-2507(C)

These presumptions can be overcome with clear and convincing evidence. But the cleaner approach is to be explicit. A new will should state whether it revokes all prior wills and codicils. That one sentence avoids ambiguity. It prevents conflicting documents from complicating probate.

Families with minor children should pay special attention. Guardianship nominations in an older will could be lost if a newer planning document does not address them. Reviewing all existing state laws that affect your documents helps ensure nothing important falls through the cracks.

A. A testator may revoke a will in whole or in part: 1. By executing a subsequent will that revokes the previous will or part expressly or by inconsistency. 2. By performing a revocatory act on the will if the testator performs the act with this intent or if another person performs the act in the testator's conscious presence and by the testator's direction. For the purposes of this paragraph, "revocatory act on the will" includes burning, tearing, canceling, obliterating, rendering unreadable or destroying the will or any part of it. A burning, tearing or canceling is a revocatory act on the will whether or not the burn, tear or cancellation touched any of the words on the will. B. If a subsequent will does not expressly revoke a previous will, the execution of the subsequent will wholly revokes the previous will by inconsistency if the testator intended the subsequent will to replace rather than supplement the previous will. C. The testator is presumed to have intended a subsequent will to replace rather than supplement a previous will if the subsequent will makes a complete disposition of the testator's estate. If this presumption arises and is not rebutted by clear and convincing evidence, the previous will is revoked and only the subsequent will is operative on the testator's death. D. The testator is presumed to have intended a subsequent will to supplement rather than replace a previous will if the subsequent will does not make a complete disposition of the testator's estate. If this presumption arises and is not rebutted by clear and convincing evidence, the subsequent will revokes the previous will only to the extent the subsequent will is inconsistent with the previous will and each will is fully operative on the testator's death to the extent the wills are not inconsistent.

This page provides general legal information about Arizona statutes and is not legal advice. For guidance on how this law applies to your situation, speak with a qualified attorney.

Get Started Today

Need Help With Your Estate Plan?

Whether you are just getting started or reviewing an existing plan, RJP Estate Planning works hand in hand with experienced estate planning counsel to help you understand your options.

(480) 346-3570