Skip to main content
Skip to explanation
  1. Home
  2. Law Library
  3. A.R.S. § 14-5312.01
A.R.S. § 14-5312.01

Guardian Authority for Inpatient Mental Health Treatment in Arizona

Verified April 4, 2026 • 57th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

When a guardian needs to consent to inpatient psychiatric treatment for an incapacitated ward, Arizona law requires a separate court authorization beyond the standard guardianship appointment. This statute sets out the evidence required, the ward's rights, and the ongoing review process.

Title 14, PROTECTION OF PERSONS UNDER DISABILITY AND THEIR PROPERTY

azleg.gov

When Court Authorization Is Required

A guardian can consent to outpatient psychiatric care, including psychotropic medications, without additional court approval. But inpatient placement in a licensed psychiatric facility is different. Arizona law requires the guardian to obtain specific court authorization before consenting to that level of treatment.

On clear and convincing evidence that the ward is an incapacitated person and is likely to be in need of inpatient mental health care and treatment within the period of the authority granted pursuant to this section, the court may authorize a guardian appointed pursuant to this title to give consent for the ward to receive inpatient mental health care and treatment.

A.R.S. § 14-5312.01(B)

The "clear and convincing evidence" standard is a high bar. A mental health expert, either a psychiatrist or licensed psychologist, must support the request with a professional opinion. The court must also consider the least restrictive treatment alternative and may limit the duration and scope of the guardian's authority.

Protections for the Ward

Arizona builds extensive safeguards into this process. Within forty-eight hours of placement, the guardian must notify the ward's attorney. The attorney can then assess whether the placement is appropriate and request a court hearing within three days. The inpatient facility must reassess the ward's placement every thirty days.

The ward's guardian shall place the ward in a least restrictive treatment alternative within five days after the guardian is notified by the medical director of the inpatient facility that the ward no longer needs inpatient care.

A.R.S. § 14-5312.01(I)

The ward's attorney has access to all medical, psychiatric, and treatment records. If the ward requests release or a change in treatment, the facility must forward that request to the attorney within twenty-four hours. These protections recognize that involuntary psychiatric placement is one of the most significant restrictions on personal liberty that a guardian can authorize, and the law ensures ongoing oversight at every stage.

A. Except as provided in subsection B of this section, a guardian of an incapacitated person may consent to psychiatric and psychological care and treatment, including the administration of psychotropic medications, if the care and treatment take place outside an inpatient psychiatric facility licensed by the department of health services. B. On clear and convincing evidence that the ward is an incapacitated person and is likely to be in need of inpatient mental health care and treatment within the period of the authority granted pursuant to this section, the court may authorize a guardian appointed pursuant to this title to give consent for the ward to receive inpatient mental health care and treatment, including placement in an inpatient psychiatric facility licensed by the department of health services and medical, psychiatric and psychological treatment associated with that placement. The evidence shall be supported by the opinion of a mental health expert who is either a physician licensed pursuant to title 32, chapter 13 or 17 and who is a specialist in psychiatry or a psychologist who is licensed pursuant to title 32, chapter 19.1. C. In making its decision to grant authority to a guardian pursuant to subsection B of this section, the court shall consider the cause of the ward's disability and the ward's foreseeable clinical needs. The court shall limit the guardian's authority to what is reasonably necessary to obtain the care required for the ward in the least restrictive treatment alternative. The court may limit the duration of the guardian's authority to consent to inpatient mental health care and treatment and include other orders the court determines necessary to protect the ward's best interests. D. Within forty-eight hours after placement of the ward pursuant to this section, the guardian shall give notice of this action to the ward's attorney. When the attorney receives this notice the attorney shall assess the appropriateness of the placement pursuant to section 36-537, subsection B and section 36-546, subsection H. If requested by the attorney, the court shall hold a hearing on the appropriateness of the placement within three days after receiving that request. E. The inpatient psychiatric facility shall assess the appropriateness of the ward's placement every thirty days and shall provide a copy of the assessment report to the ward's attorney on request. The ward's attorney may attend the ward's evaluation, staffing, treatment team and case management meetings. F. When the ward is admitted to an inpatient psychiatric facility pursuant to this section, the guardian shall provide the facility with the name, address and telephone number of the ward's attorney. The facility shall include this information in the ward's treatment record. G. Within twenty-four hours after the facility receives any writing in which the ward requests release from the facility, any change in placement or a change in the type or duration of treatment, the facility shall forward this information to the ward's attorney. H. All health care providers, treatment facilities and regional behavioral health authorities shall allow the ward's attorney access to all of the ward's medical, psychiatric, psychological and other treatment records. I. The ward's guardian shall place the ward in a least restrictive treatment alternative within five days after the guardian is notified by the medical director of the inpatient facility that the ward no longer needs inpatient care. The ward, a representative of the inpatient treatment facility, the ward's attorney, the ward's physician or any other interested person may petition the court to order the facility to discharge the ward to a least restrictive treatment alternative if the guardian does not act promptly to do so. L. If deemed necessary to adequately assess a request for inpatient mental health treatment authority or to review the ward's placement in an inpatient psychiatric facility, the court may order an independent evaluation by either a physician who is licensed pursuant to title 32, chapter 13 or 17 and who is a specialist in psychiatry or a psychologist who is licensed pursuant to title 32, chapter 19.1. If the ward has insufficient funds to pay the total cost of this evaluation, the court may deem all or any part of the evaluator's fee to be a county expense after determining the reasonableness of that fee. M. Instead of ordering an independent evaluation pursuant to subsection L of this section, the court may accept a report conducted on behalf of the inpatient psychiatric facility if the court finds that the report meets the requirements of an independent evaluation. N. The court may decide that the ward's right to retain or obtain a driver license and any other civil right that may be suspended by operation of law is not affected by the appointment of a guardian. O. If the court grants the guardian the authority to consent to inpatient mental health care and treatment pursuant to this section, the medical director of an inpatient psychiatric facility licensed by the department of health services may admit the ward at the guardian's request. P. A guardian who is authorized by the court to consent to inpatient mental health care and treatment pursuant to this section shall file with the annual report of the guardian required pursuant to section 14-5315 an evaluation report by a physician or a psychologist who meets the requirements of subsection B of this section. The evaluation report shall indicate if the ward will likely need inpatient mental health care and treatment within the period of the authority granted pursuant to this section. If the guardian does not file the evaluation report or if the report indicates that the ward will not likely need inpatient mental health care and treatment, the guardian's authority to consent to this treatment ceases on the expiration of the period specified in the prior court order. If the report supports the continuation of the guardian's authority to consent to inpatient treatment, the court may order that the guardian's authority to consent to this treatment continues. If the report supports the continuation of the guardian's authority to consent to this treatment, the ward's attorney shall review the report with the ward. The ward may contest the continuation of the guardian's authority by filing a request for a court hearing within ten business days after the report is filed. The court shall hold this hearing within thirty calendar days after it receives the request. The guardian's authority continues pending the court's ruling on the issue. At the hearing the guardian has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the ward is likely to be in need of inpatient mental health care and treatment within the period of the authority granted pursuant to this section. Q. The court may discharge an attorney who was appointed pursuant to section 14-5303, subsection C subsequent to the appointment of a guardian if it clearly appears from specific facts presented by affidavit or verified petition that continued representation of the ward is no longer necessary or desirable.
View on azleg.gov

This page provides general legal information about Arizona statutes and is not legal advice. For guidance on how this law applies to your situation, speak with a qualified attorney.

Related Questions

Why do I need a Financial Power of Attorney?

Without a Financial Power of Attorney, your family may face a costly conservatorship to manage your finances. This document lets you choose who handles your money and when their authority begins.

How do guardianship and conservatorship proceedings work in Arizona?

Both require filing with the Arizona Superior Court, medical evidence of incapacity, and a judge's approval. The process takes months and costs thousands. Powers of attorney accomplish the same goals without court involvement.

Related Statutes

§ 14-5309Notice Requirements in Adult Guardianship Proceedings
§ 14-5311Who Can Serve as Guardian for an Incapacitated Adult in Arizona
§ 14-5312Powers and Duties of a Guardian for an Incapacitated Adult

Related Services

Court-appointed protection for vulnerable individuals

Guardianship & Conservatorship

When a loved one can no longer manage their own affairs due to incapacity, guardianship and conservatorship provide a legal framework for their care and financial protection.

Learn more
Get Started Today

Need Help With Your Estate Plan?

Whether you are just getting started or reviewing an existing plan, RJP Estate Planning works hand in hand with experienced estate planning counsel to help you understand your options.

(480) 346-3570
RJP Estate Planning

Protecting Arizona families through comprehensive estate planning since 1995.

Quick Links

  • Services
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Resources
  • FAQ
  • Glossary
  • Educational Law Library
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Contact

Our Offices

Scottsdale Office

4110 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 170

Scottsdale, AZ 85251

Tucson Office

5151 E. Broadway Blvd Suite 750

Tucson, AZ 85711

Contact Us

(480) 346-3570care@rjpaz.com

© 2026 RJP Estate Planning. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

The Planning Consultants at RJP Estate Planning provide services in the areas of estate planning, planning with wills and trusts, asset protection, probate avoidance, probate & estate administration, long-term care planning, Medicaid planning, asset protection from Medicaid, veterans benefits, charitable planning, special needs, estate tax planning, and business succession planning. They serve clients and their families throughout Scottsdale, Phoenix, and Sun City, Arizona, and the surrounding cities and towns.

RJP Estate Planning is not a law firm, cannot give legal advice, and does not prepare legal documents. For legal services, clients separately consult with an estate planning attorney or law firm.

RJP-AZ, LLC (RJP Estate Planning) is licensed to offer insurance products and receive commissions for those products. Its representatives who discuss these products with you hold individual licenses.

Securities are offered through CoreCap Investments, LLC, a registered broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services are offered through CoreCap Advisors, LLC, a registered investment advisor. RJP Estate Planning and RJP-AZ, LLC are separate and unaffiliated entities and are not affiliated with CoreCap Investments or CoreCap Advisors. Representatives that offer these services hold the required licenses.

Some products or services are provided by trusted companies/service providers. These companies/providers are separate and unaffiliated entities from RJP-AZ, LLC.