Skip to main content
Skip to explanation
  1. Home
  2. Law Library
  3. A.R.S. § 14-5316
A.R.S. § 14-5316

A Ward's Right to Maintain Relationships Under Guardianship

Verified April 4, 2026 • 57th Legislature, 1st Regular Session

Arizona law protects a ward's right to stay connected with family and friends. A guardian must encourage contact and cannot restrict it unless there is a genuine risk to the ward's health, safety, or well-being. If a guardian unreasonably blocks contact, the court can intervene and even remove the guardian.

Title 14, PROTECTION OF PERSONS UNDER DISABILITY AND THEIR PROPERTY

azleg.gov

The Guardian's Duty to Encourage Contact

One of the most sensitive aspects of guardianship is what happens to a ward's personal relationships. Arizona law is clear: guardians must encourage and allow contact between the ward and people who have a significant relationship with them.

A guardian shall encourage and allow contact between the ward and other persons who have a significant relationship with the ward. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, a guardian shall not limit, restrict or prohibit contact between the ward and any person with whom the ward wishes to have contact unless the guardian reasonably believes that the contact will be detrimental to the ward's health, safety or welfare.

A.R.S. § 14-5316(A)(B)

The guardian must also consider the ward's own wishes, provided the ward has sufficient mental capacity to express a preference. This protects the ward's autonomy even within the constraints of a guardianship.

How Family and Friends Can Petition for Contact

If a guardian restricts contact, the people affected are not without recourse. Any person with a significant relationship to the ward, or the ward themselves, can petition the court for a contact order. The petitioner must show they have a meaningful relationship with the ward. The guardian bears the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the requested contact would be harmful.

The court considers several factors when evaluating these petitions: the history of the relationship, the ward's wishes, the mental and physical health of both parties, and whether the person seeking contact has any history of domestic violence, abuse, neglect, or exploitation.

If the court finds that the guardian has unreasonably denied contact, the consequences can be significant. The court may remove the guardian entirely, order the guardian to pay the attorney fees of the person who was denied contact, or both. This strong enforcement mechanism reflects Arizona's commitment to protecting the human connections that matter most to vulnerable adults.

A. A guardian shall encourage and allow contact between the ward and other persons who have a significant relationship with the ward. B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, a guardian shall not limit, restrict or prohibit contact between the ward and any person with whom the ward wishes to have contact unless the guardian reasonably believes that the contact will be detrimental to the ward's health, safety or welfare. C. In exercising the guardian's powers pursuant to subsections A and B of this section, the guardian shall consider the wishes of the ward, if the ward has sufficient mental capacity to make an intelligent choice. D. A person who has a significant relationship to the ward may petition the court for an order compelling the guardian to allow the person to have contact with the ward. The petition shall describe the nature of the relationship between the person and the ward and the type and frequency of contact being requested. The person has the burden of proving that the person has a significant relationship with the ward. The guardian has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the requested contact will be detrimental to the ward's health, safety or welfare. E. A ward may petition the court for an order compelling the guardian to allow the ward to have contact with a person who has a significant relationship to the ward. The petition shall describe the nature of the relationship between the person and the ward and the type and frequency of contact being requested. The ward has the burden of proving that the person has a significant relationship with the ward. The guardian has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that the requested contact will be detrimental to the ward's health, safety or welfare. F. After filing a petition pursuant to subsection D or E of this section, the petitioner shall request that the court set an initial hearing on the petition. Unless the petitioner requests a later initial hearing, the initial hearing shall occur as soon as possible but no later than fifteen judicial days after the court receives the petitioner's request. G. In determining what, if any, contact between the person and the ward is in the ward's best interest, the court shall consider all factors that are relevant to the ward's physical and emotional well-being, including the following: 1. The past and present relationship between the ward and the person with whom the contact is requested. 2. The wishes of the ward if the ward has sufficient mental capacity to make an intelligent choice. 3. The mental and physical health of the ward and the person with whom the contact is requested. 4. Whether the person with whom the contact is requested has committed any act involving domestic violence as defined in section 13-3601, child abuse or abuse, neglect or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. 5. Whether the person with whom the contact is requested has abused drugs or alcohol or has been convicted of any drug offense listed in title 13, chapter 34 or a violation of title 28, chapter 4, article 3. 6. Whether the person with whom the contact is requested is listed in the elder abuse central registry pursuant to section 46-457 or is required to register pursuant to section 13-3821. 7. Whether the person with whom the contact is requested has been convicted of a violation of section 13-2907.02 or 13-2907.04. O. If, in a proceeding brought under this section, the court finds that the guardian has unreasonably denied contact between a ward and a person who has a significant relationship with the ward, the court may do either, or both, of the following: 1. Remove the guardian. 2. Order the guardian to personally pay some or all of the reasonable attorney fees and expenses incurred by the person or the ward, or both.
View on azleg.gov

This page provides general legal information about Arizona statutes and is not legal advice. For guidance on how this law applies to your situation, speak with a qualified attorney.

Related Questions

How do guardianship and conservatorship proceedings work in Arizona?

Both require filing with the Arizona Superior Court, medical evidence of incapacity, and a judge's approval. The process takes months and costs thousands. Powers of attorney accomplish the same goals without court involvement.

How can I prevent family conflict over my estate plan?

The most effective way to prevent conflict is to put your intentions in writing with clarity. Spell out who receives what, who manages the estate, and explain your reasoning if shares are unequal.

Related Statutes

§ 14-5101Key Definitions for Arizona Guardianship and Protective Proceedings
§ 14-5102Court Jurisdiction Over Guardianship and Conservatorship in Arizona
§ 14-5103Facility of Payment or Delivery to a Minor in Arizona

Related Services

Court-appointed protection for vulnerable individuals

Guardianship & Conservatorship

When a loved one can no longer manage their own affairs due to incapacity, guardianship and conservatorship provide a legal framework for their care and financial protection.

Learn more
Get Started Today

Need Help With Your Estate Plan?

Whether you are just getting started or reviewing an existing plan, RJP Estate Planning works hand in hand with experienced estate planning counsel to help you understand your options.

(480) 346-3570
RJP Estate Planning

Protecting Arizona families through comprehensive estate planning since 1995.

Quick Links

  • Services
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Resources
  • FAQ
  • Glossary
  • Educational Law Library
  • Events
  • Careers
  • Contact

Our Offices

Scottsdale Office

4110 N. Scottsdale Road Suite 170

Scottsdale, AZ 85251

Tucson Office

5151 E. Broadway Blvd Suite 750

Tucson, AZ 85711

Contact Us

(480) 346-3570care@rjpaz.com

© 2026 RJP Estate Planning. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyTerms of Service

The Planning Consultants at RJP Estate Planning provide services in the areas of estate planning, planning with wills and trusts, asset protection, probate avoidance, probate & estate administration, long-term care planning, Medicaid planning, asset protection from Medicaid, veterans benefits, charitable planning, special needs, estate tax planning, and business succession planning. They serve clients and their families throughout Scottsdale, Phoenix, and Sun City, Arizona, and the surrounding cities and towns.

RJP Estate Planning is not a law firm, cannot give legal advice, and does not prepare legal documents. For legal services, clients separately consult with an estate planning attorney or law firm.

RJP-AZ, LLC (RJP Estate Planning) is licensed to offer insurance products and receive commissions for those products. Its representatives who discuss these products with you hold individual licenses.

Securities are offered through CoreCap Investments, LLC, a registered broker-dealer and member FINRA/SIPC. Advisory services are offered through CoreCap Advisors, LLC, a registered investment advisor. RJP Estate Planning and RJP-AZ, LLC are separate and unaffiliated entities and are not affiliated with CoreCap Investments or CoreCap Advisors. Representatives that offer these services hold the required licenses.

Some products or services are provided by trusted companies/service providers. These companies/providers are separate and unaffiliated entities from RJP-AZ, LLC.